Deontological Vs. Teleological Ethical Systems

Deontological vs . Teleological Ethical SystemsIn our e rattlingday life , we argon forever faced by many dilemmas . Most of them be in truth difficult to solve or even understand . The simple-minded foundation of stimulateting by these problems is by considering moral philosophy . The 2 come alonges employ in this concept are the deontological and the teleological climax . The main difference between the two is where the sound judgement , whether this is cracking or icky , should be made . In the deontological cash advance , the judgment lies in the beginning or at the beat of doing . That is , if you re now doing your duty or doing what is best , thus you are doing estimable exercises whether in the end it may piddle pretty results or lead have unhealthful effectuate to something . On the otherwise hand t he teleological commence emphasizes the consequences of what star is doing , that is , the judgment of morality lies at the end or later the put through is done . Thus , whether the follow through seems big(p) for someone plainly if it forget have turn a profits or will result to good , then that achievement is ethical For exemplification , lying to masking piece someone or that will result to goodness is bad through the deontological approach since it violates the duty of being honest , that it is good in teleological because it helps to the goodness of someoneLike what is stated , the foundation of making decisions in each dilemma is the ethics . The tempered of instruction or principles used in ethics is stored or compiled in a theoretical account called ethical frames . There are seven known ethical systems namely , the ethical hypocrisy utilitarianism , religion , natural jurisprudence , ethics of virtue , ethics of care and the egoismThe ethical cant is a g ood example to show the deontological approa! ch in applying ethics . In this system , the basis of judgment is only when on the motive of doing the exploit .

If the motive is good whether it so far results to something bad , then the action is good . Similarly if thither is an ulterior motive in doing the action whether it will benefit others , then the action will be considered bad . The basis of uttering good or bad lies in universal proposition concepts that states that what is good must be good for e trulyone . For example , if your fellow asks you to help her in her assignment and you said yes to her , then your action can either be considered g ood or bad according to the motive . If you re real in helping her , or you re not expecting any reenforcement for doing so , then your action is good . Your action is bad is you re expecting a reward , say a free dinnerOn the other hand , a very good example in seeing the teleological approach is the utilitarianism . Here , the action is judged on the benefits or the utilities derived from doing the action . If it will benefit many or will have bigger benefits even if it is not reproducible with our duties , then the action is moral . That is , it is ok to...If you want to get a full essay, swan it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper