Psychological Journal Article Summary and Analysis Research Paper

Psychological Journal Article Summary and Analysis - Research root word ExampleAnother explicit purpose of the study was to compare mere exposure (exposure without a reward) to a no-treatment control characterise. The role that this control condition played in the experiment was to provide a baseline for the analysis of shaver responses when external rewards were presented. The authors were also interested several factors that contribute to the discrepancy amongst the lean for rewards to increase acceptance in field studies on one hand, but the tendency of rewards to decrease proneness in laboratory studies. Implicit in the determination of their study, the researchers attempted to study the type of reward used, the sign liking, and the intended outcome of the study and whether those factors play a role. To accomplish these tasks, the researchers used a cluster-randomized experimental design that arranged over 400 children into four conditions an exposure plus tangible non-fo od reward, an exposure plus social reward, an exposure alone, and a no-treatment control group. Over 12 days, the children were presented daily with the exposure to a vegetable that children consider objectionable in gustation. Then, the children from the respective conditions were both given an additional reward or, for those in the control condition, left field alone. The results measured from these tests of taste were collected at a one-month and a three-month point after the 12 exposures in order to examine the effects of the exposures on acquisition and tutelage of the taste. This research design was intended to either accept or reject the hypothesis that external rewards have a significant effect on changing childrens tastes for vegetables. The children in the study fell in between the range of 4 and 6 years old and were randomly assigned to their conditions. To test each of the children individu eithery, the researchers used a vegetable that the child rated in the middl e of five other vegetables so that there was the potential of learning to enjoy the taste of that middle vegetable. During the intervention period, children were given praise as a reward (in the social reward condition), a sticker (in the tangible non-food condition), or minimal social interaction (in the no exposure condition). Through all of this testing, the researchers discovered that liking for the vegetable increased in the three intervention conditions as compared to the control condition, in which children were not exposed to the vegetable. Within these results, there was no significant difference in liking between each of the exposure conditions (that is, social rewards did not increase liking more than non-food tangible rewards). In call of timing after the initial study, each of the interventions maintained their difference at a significant train for one month, during the acquisition phase. However, children who were rewarded with external rewards maintained their likin g for three months or more during the maintenance phase. Likewise, during this maintenance phase, there was no significant difference between the social reward and the non-food tangible reward condition in terms of who continued to like the vegetables more. Meanwhile, the effect of the no reward exposure because insignificant by that three month point. In other words, external rewards do not produce negative effects and may actually be useful to